Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
involved the stakes
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "involved the stakes" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey a situation where something is at risk or has significant consequences, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The negotiations involved the stakes of the entire project, making it crucial for both parties to reach an agreement."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
For those involved, the stakes couldn't be higher.
News & Media
Given the number of people involved, the stakes are particularly high.
News & Media
But now that federal investigators are involved, the stakes are higher.
News & Media
For all actors involved, the stakes in this project were rather high - the State, the Residents of Khirki and the experts.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
56 human-written examples
When you see the kind of money involved, and the stakes involved, and the spread of this kind of technology around the world, it's virtually inevitable".
News & Media
But beyond the stakes involved, the battle is unusual in other ways.
News & Media
Given the stakes involved, the situation surrounding the federal recognition should not be surprising.
News & Media
However, given the stakes involved, the Department of Defense will continue a robust SSBN Security Program that aims to anticipate potential threats and develop appropriate countermeasures to protect current and future SSBNs.
News & Media
Only now, the N.C.A.A. is involved and the stakes are higher, and two entities near the end of long and scrutinized summers are seeing their paths intersect.
News & Media
Considering the high stakes involved, the testing needs to be double-blind and include both positive and negative reference samples.
News & Media
Given human nature and the high stakes involved, the answer is -- and I mean this in the old-fashioned sense of the term -- "no".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing potential risks or consequences, use established phrases like "stakes involved" or "what is at stake" for clarity and grammatical correctness.
Common error
Avoid using "involved the stakes" as it is grammatically incorrect. Instead, clarify the connection between the parties involved and the stakes by saying "the parties involved understand the stakes".
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "involved the stakes" attempts to connect an action or situation with potential risks or consequences. However, this construction is grammatically unsound. As Ludwig AI points out, this usage lacks clarity and proper structure.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "involved the stakes" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in formal writing. While the intention is to emphasize the potential risks or consequences, it lacks clarity. Ludwig AI suggests using alternative phrases such as "stakes involved" or clarifying the relationship between the parties and the stakes more directly. As the examples provided by Ludwig demonstrate, this phrase is infrequent and appears in both news media and scientific contexts, although its incorrect grammatical structure should be avoided.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
stakes involved
Omits "involved the", focusing directly on the importance of potential outcomes.
risks at stake
Replaces "involved" with "at stake", highlighting the element of risk.
implications of the stakes
Shifts focus to the potential effects or results of what is at risk.
consequences of the stakes
Focuses on the results or effects that may occur based on what is at risk.
what's at risk
Simplifies the phrasing to focus on the elements that could be lost or harmed.
potential repercussions of the stakes
Emphasizes the possible negative outcomes that could arise.
importance of the stakes
Highlights the significance or crucial nature of what is at risk.
stakes in question
Replaces "involved" with "in question", emphasizing the elements being considered.
matters at stake
Focuses on the important issues or affairs that are at risk.
dangers at stake
Highlights the perilous or hazardous aspects of what could be lost.
FAQs
How can I correctly use "stakes" in a sentence?
Use phrases like "the "stakes involved"" or "what is at stake" to properly convey the importance or risk of a situation.
What are some alternatives to "involved the stakes"?
Instead of "involved the stakes", try using "included the "stakes"", "entailed the stakes", or rephrase to clarify the relationship. For example, the negotiation included high stakes.
Is it correct to say "involved the stakes"?
No, "involved the stakes" is not grammatically correct. It's better to use phrases like "stakes involved" or describe who is involved and what the stakes are separately.
How can I emphasize the importance of something at risk?
You can highlight the importance by using phrases like "the "significance of the stakes"" or "the potential consequences" to underline what might happen.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
89%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested