Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(37)
Both knees were tested with the uninvolved or less painful leg (in the case of bilateral knee involvement) tested first, followed by the involved leg.
In the group with unilateral involvement, mean (SD) VAS of the involved leg was 6.3 cm (2.14), with no pain reported in the contralateral leg.
Significant differences were observed between the lower extremities in terms of MVIC of the quadriceps muscle in the entire group and in the subgroups with the unilateral and bilateral leg involvement, in favor of the less involved leg.
In case of bilateral involvement, the more painful leg was considered the involved leg.
The hypothesis was that the involved leg would demonstrate deficits compared with uninvolved and matched legs.
As noted by Gautier et al. [10], the growth deformity is occasionally an overgrowth in the involved leg, despite the described damage to the physis.
Similar(23)
The intragroup analysis showed no differences between the results of involved legs and uninvolved legs in the SB ACLR and DB ACLR groups (Table 3).
The involved legs (SB ACLR group and DB ACLR group) were compared with the values obtained in right legs in the control group in the measurement during the first session.
However, the results of ANOVA test comparing obtained results in involved legs in groups after ACLR and the right leg in control group showed statistically significant differences in hip rotation during all of the gait cycles (Table 5).
The comparison of the results of involved legs in SB ACLR and DB ACLR groups and right leg in control group showed statistically significant differences in the 5 gait cycle phases: KHS, K1, KTO, K3, and K4 (Table 3).
In an initial experiment, subjects had to raise their non-involved leg to the target height with visual feedback and keep the position for 7 seconds and put down the leg to rest 5 seconds and repeated the same measure again.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com