Subsequently, the inconsistent results obtained from both investigated test methods are analysed and discussed.
Despite significant improvements in all of the clinical and microbiological parameters investigated, test (i.e. alternative methods for biofilm removal, adjunctive antiseptic therapy, or adjunctive antibiotic therapy) and control treatments were commonly associated with residual BI and BOP scores at 3 to 12 months after therapy (Tables 6, 7 and 8).
The relaxed density and compressive strength in cleft of the briquettes were investigated using standard testing methods.
The relaxed density, compressive strength in cleft and impact resistance index ofthe briquettes produced were investigated using standard testing methods.
Despite significant improvements in all of the clinical parameters investigated, test (i.e. alternative or adjunctive methods for biofilm removal, adjunctive antiseptic therapy, or adjunctive antibiotic therapy) and control treatments were commonly associated with residual gingival index (GI), BI, and/or BOP scores at 3 to 12 months after therapy (Tables 3, 4 and 5).
Hence, there is a high demand to investigate alternative non-destructive testing methods.
It is important to note the difference between the DeLong et al. method and the significance testing methods investigated in the previous section for comparing nested models.
In the current study, we have used a range of anatomical, structural and biomechanical testing methods to investigate the biomechanical and material properties of the long bones in mice harbouring a functional knockout of Mecp2.
The EM wave reflectivity of the prepared plasterboard was investigated by arched testing method, and the influences of CB contents and geometrical parameters of honeycomb structure on the wave absorption were analyzed.
These two issues were always investigated based on empirical approaches or testing methods.
The biomechanical properties of the cornea have been commonly investigated by uniaxial tensile and inflation testing methods.
