invalidated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "invalidated with" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey that something has been rendered invalid by a specific factor, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "The contract was invalidated with the discovery of fraud."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Ministers say cardholders were aware they would be invalidated with a change of government.

BBC

The decision amounts to a big victory for KSR, which had been sued for infringement under the Teleflex patent that the high court invalidated with this ruling.

Science Magazine

From the experiment, we also see that the compensation at a certain time will be gradually invalidated with time because of the short-term instability of the oscillator's output frequency.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Given the simplicity of the kinetics in the model and limited number of components, we wanted to assess its informative level and our results showed that the model could not be invalidated with the available data.

BMC Systems Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Closely linked and overlapped with emotional neglect, invalidation occurs when the victim's feelings and needs are completely invalidated, usually with harmful intent.

WikiHow

A replacement for the predecessor arrangement had in fact been being negotiated long before the ECJ invalidated Safe Harbor — with the latter event undoubtedly helping to accelerate the rest of the talks by injecting the urgency of uncertainty (thus allowing Hancock to claim it took 'nine months').

TechCrunch

Otherwise the lower sensitivity of the pre-treatment survey would have invalidated comparisons with the follow-up surveys.

BMC Infectious Diseases

It is not clear what that "in connection with" language means: Citigroup has argued that it means that the deal between Wachovia and Wells Fargo was prohibited, while Wachovia is likely to argue that the bailout provision invalidated its agreement with Citigroup.

The New York Times

The original ruling by the judge of the District Court had invalidated the patents with the observation that the DNA involved was known through its 'information content, its conveyance of the genetic code'.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

Prognosis was not studied for HER-2 or CD117+ patients: the very low number of involved subjects invalidated statistical comparisons with the log-rank test.

British Journal of Cancer

These findings corroborate previous research in women's health issues wherein women have expressed feeling dismissed and invalidated in encounters with health professionals [ 12], stereotyped [ 23], or not having their health care needs met [ 23].

BMC Women's Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical accuracy, prefer using "invalidated by" or "rendered invalid due to" instead of "invalidated with".

Common error

Avoid using "with" to express a cause-and-effect relationship when describing invalidation. "With" typically denotes accompaniment or means, not causation. For example, instead of saying "The contract was invalidated with the discovery of fraud", say "The contract was invalidated by the discovery of fraud."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "invalidated with" is typically used to express that something has been rendered not valid. However, according to Ludwig AI, this construction is not correct in standard written English. The correct usage is typically "invalidated by".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

25%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "invalidated with" attempts to convey that something has been rendered invalid by a specific factor, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct phrasing is usually "invalidated by" or "rendered invalid due to". Although examples can be found across various sources like news and science, adhering to standard grammar practices is recommended for clarity and professionalism. Therefore, consider using alternatives such as ""invalidated by"", which clearly indicates causation, or "rendered invalid by" for a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

invalidated by

Replaces "with" to indicate a direct cause or agent responsible for the invalidation.

rendered invalid by

Uses a more formal tone, emphasizing the state of being made invalid due to a specific reason.

nullified by

Indicates that something has been made void or of no effect due to a specific action or event.

voided by

Similar to "nullified", but implies a more formal or legal context where something is declared not valid.

made invalid due to

Explicitly states that the invalidation is a consequence of a specific cause or condition.

overruled by

Suggests that a decision or rule has been reversed or superseded by a higher authority or subsequent event.

superseded by

Implies that something has been replaced by something else, rendering the original obsolete or invalid.

negated by

Indicates that something has been cancelled out or made ineffective by an opposing force or factor.

annulled by

Suggests a formal or legal cancellation of something, making it no longer valid or binding.

revoked by

Implies that something has been officially taken back or cancelled, rendering it invalid.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something was made invalid?

The correct phrasing typically involves using "invalidated by" or "rendered invalid due to". For example, "The agreement was "invalidated by" the new law" is preferable to "invalidated with".

What can I use instead of "invalidated with"?

Alternatives include ""invalidated by"", "rendered invalid by", or "made invalid due to" depending on the context.

Is "invalidated with" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "invalidated with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard written English. It's better to use ""invalidated by"".

How does the choice of preposition affect the meaning of "invalidated"?

Using "by" indicates the direct cause or agent of invalidation, while "with" suggests accompaniment or means, which is not appropriate in this context. Therefore, ""invalidated by"" is clearer and more grammatically sound.