Sentence examples for invalidated section from inspiring English sources
But it invalidated section four, which sets the conditions under which parts of the US must submit voting changes to federal monitoring.
After the same court invalidated Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, conservative state legislatures took mere hours to dust off numerous discriminatory voting laws, resulting in documented cases of voter suppression nationwide.
Section 3 relief is a much less reliable mechanism than the now invalidated Section 4. It allows much greater discretion on the part of the federal courts, requires a much higher evidentiary standard, and permits laws to become effective while decisions are pending, rather than before elections take place.
A coalition of civil rights groups, including the ACLU, is now challenging a package of voting restrictions that North Carolina rushed to pass after the Supreme Court invalidated Section 5.
In a bitterly-divided five-to-four decision, the Supreme Court invalidated section 3 of DOMA on June 26 , 2013- ten years to the day after its decision in Lawrence.
The Justice Department is currently challenging voter identification laws and other restrictions in North Carolina and Texas in response to last year's Shelby v. Holder ruling, which invalidated Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
That's why EFF has filed a lawsuit against the US government seeking to invalidate Section 1201 of the DMCA.
One v. Holder, a case name usually abbreviated as Namudno, the court appeared on the verge of invalidating Section 5 before pulling back at the last minute.
The Supreme Courtâs decision in Shelby County v. Holder to invalidate Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act was based on the progress that Mississippi has made in the past 50 years.
However, it seems unlikely that Article 93 can be relied on to invalidate section 8B(2) since Parliament specifically enacted Article 149(3) to protect the 1989 amendments to the ISA from inconsistency with Article 93.
By invalidating Section 4 and effectively blocking the use of Section 5, the 5-4 Court majority in Shelby County v. Holder disingenuously held that the abuses that led Congress in 1965 to require states to be supervised by federal authority no longer existed, because the civil rights revolution and done its work.
