Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(59)
It sometimes remains non-intuitive for the reader, that the nomenclature rules are not the same for mouse and zebrafish, so we have chosen zebrafish nomenclature, unless specifically referring to mouse data.
I don't write for the reader.
He's up for The Reader.
This threesome is uncomfortable for the reader.
For the reader - not so much.
This is unnecessarily confusing for the reader.
It is hard for the reader.
Unfortunately, trees are difficult for students as they have substantial visual conventions that are not particularly intuitive for novice readers (Halverson et al. 2011) (for example, Halverson et al. 2011; Gregory 2008; Naegle 2009; Perry et al. 2008).
The intuitive for the above theorem is straightforward.
Additionally, it offers an intuitive mapping interface for the general reader as well as an openly available ontology for community reuse.
One for the readers?
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com