The magnitude of the mandibular autorotation after molar intrusion was dependent on a set of interrelated factors including amount of intrusive force, duration of intrusion, and place of intrusion in upper or lower arch.
Overall, the strongest independent risk factors for PTSD were three acute psychological factors (ICU mood, intrusive memories and perceived illness timeline) and a chronic factor, psychological history (Table 5, column 3).
These findings are consistent with the idea that a pre-morbid deficit in the ability to resist proactive interference reflects a vulnerability factor for experiencing intrusive memories after trauma exposure.
However, once you've accepted it's not going to be a pure, unfettered idyll, these factors become less intrusive.
On the basis of these observations, Ehlers and Clark (2000) suggested that one of the factors leading to intrusive memories in PTSD is that the worst moments of the trauma memory are poorly elaborated and inadequately linked with their context of relevant subsequent and preceding information and other autobiographical memories.
Our results suggest that disgust propensity may be one factor that predicts recurring intrusive cognitions after an event involving witnessing injury or bodily harm.
However, the association of pre-traumatic factors with post-traumatic intrusive memories is still only poorly understood.
This advanced, vascular pattern recognition solution is highly reliable and in a form factor that is non-intrusive and generates extremely fast authentication.
Although still preliminary, results suggest that disgust propensity may be one factor that predicts frequency of intrusive memories after witnessing injury or bodily harm.
Within the acute psychological group, the strongest risk factors were total ICU mood, intrusive memories and perceived illness timeline (Additional file 1, Table S2).
