Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

introduction was done

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "introduction was done" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that an introduction has been completed, often in the context of a presentation, report, or discussion. Example: "After the introduction was done, we moved on to the main topics of the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Precursor introduction was done by opening the inlet valve between the reservoir and reactor chamber while the outlet valve was closed.

Which its introduction was done tactfully very well.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Sample introduction was done with New Objective Econo12-N uncoated borosilicate glass emitters.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Load introduction is done with a rigid element.

In fact, Mr. Zabar, who describes himself as "a grocer," and Mr. Allen, who needs no introduction, are doing a lot more than complaining to each other.

News & Media

The New York Times

Introductions were done by first names only, and after chatting cordially for a few moments, my friend Clare and I went off to a restaurant.

It's a good idea to figure out how most introductions are done through body language.

And the introduction of Clark was done in response to a public-relations survey that found that the team needed to create a more "family-friendly" environment at the park.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Introduction of new programs was done by only two projects (4.4%).

The introduction of the approach was done with little or no consultation with relevant national authorities, UN agencies and NGOs present in the country [ 20].

Practice staff reported that the initial introduction to the HRSS was done in a busy practice meeting with insufficient time for discussion.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "introduction was done" in scientific writing, ensure the context clearly specifies what was introduced and the method or process by which it was introduced, providing clarity and precision.

Common error

Avoid using "introduction was done" without specifying what was introduced. For example, instead of "introduction was done", write "the sample introduction was done using..." to eliminate ambiguity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "introduction was done" functions as a passive construction, indicating the completion of the act of introducing something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this structure is grammatically correct. Examples show its use across various contexts, from scientific procedures to event presentations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "introduction was done" is a grammatically sound phrase used to indicate the completion of an introductory process. While Ludwig AI validates its correctness, remember that its usage tends to be neutral to formal and often appears in scientific, news, and general contexts. To enhance clarity, be sure to specify what was introduced. Although alternatives exist, such as "the introduction took place" or "the introductory phase was completed", the original phrase remains a viable option. You can improve it by focusing on avoiding the passive form when possible.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "introduction was done" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "the introduction was performed", "the introductory phase was completed", or "the presentation took place". These alternatives offer a more sophisticated and professional tone than "introduction was done".

What are some alternatives to "introduction was done" in a scientific context?

In scientific writing, you could use more precise phrases such as "sample "introduction was performed" using...", "the method was introduced", or "the procedure commenced with..." to clearly specify the action and context.

Is "introduction was done" grammatically correct?

Yes, "introduction was done" is grammatically correct, though it can sometimes sound passive. It indicates that the action of introducing something has been completed. It's usable and correct as Ludwig AI reports.

How to avoid passive voice when using "introduction was done"?

To avoid passive voice, reframe the sentence to emphasize the actor. For example, instead of "the introduction was done by the team", try "the team completed the introduction".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: