Sentence examples for introducing evidence that from inspiring English sources

In addition to the time-saving procedural mechanisms of Rule 92 bis, the Prosecution responded to the time constraints placed upon it by attempting to find innovative procedural methods of introducing evidence that would utilise the least time possible during court hearings.

In Holmes v. South Carolina, the Court considered the constitutionality of a South Carolina Supreme Court ruling that prevented Bobby Lee Holmes, a convicted rapist and murderer of an 86-year-old woman, from introducing evidence that another person may have committed the crimes.

It is unclear how convincing the "all-the-right-people-knew" defense will be, but prosecutors, led by Gerald Murphy, were worried enough about it to try to block the defense from introducing evidence that PricewaterhouseCoopers approved the payments.

"I'm allowed to introduce evidence that's relevant to my client's state of mind," Mr. Shargel said.

During the trial, Sorkin wanted to introduce evidence that would demonstrate Kassar's coöperation with U.S. authorities, but the Department of Justice objected that the evidence contained classified material.

When Abu-Ali Abdur Rahman was sentenced to death in Tennessee in 1987, his lawyers failed to introduce evidence that would probably have gotten him a lesser punishment.

Mr. Boies, undeterred, pressed on: "The point of the evidence is that when you introduce evidence, that is part of the record to be reviewed and taken into account by the court.

Mr. Fischetti had introduced evidence that showed Mr. Turetzky had lied while he was in college on forms concerning a course he was taking to become an emergency medical technician and had suggested that Mr. Turetzky could not be believed.

The judge said Gutierrez failed to introduce evidence that called into question cell tower data placing Syed in the vicinity of the murder scene.

He said that he would introduce evidence that six of them had consulted lawyers about civil litigation — and thus a financial interest.

While it would be unethical for scientists reporting on their work to omit findings that don't fit their hypotheses, lawyers are under no compunction to introduce evidence that hurts their cases; that's the other side's job.