Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
CONCLUSIONS: In this bovine model, CentraLoc and bioabsorbable interference screws provided superior resistance to cyclic loading compared with Intrafix.
The bioabsorbable interference screw proved statistically superior to Intrafix in resistance to cyclic loading (P <.05).
HYPOTHESIS: No differences exist for resistance to slippage of soft tissue grafts fixed with CentraLoc, Intrafix, or 35-mm bioabsorbable interference screws.
In this model, CentraLoc proved statistically superior in resistance to cyclic loading compared with the bioabsorbable interference screw (P <.05) and Intrafix (P <.0001).
The slippage rates under cyclic loading for the 3 types of fixation were bioabsorbable interference screw, 0.336 +/- 0.074 microm/cycle; Intrafix, 27.2 +/- 31.6 microm/cycle; and CentraLoc, 0.0355 +/- 0.0046 microm/cycle.
The type of graft (allograft versus autograft, RR = 3.3, n.s)., the type of treatment adopted to process grafts (aseptic versus sterile, RR = 70.5, 95% CI 1.1 ∝), use of supplemental tibial staples (use versus non-use, RR = 10, 95% CI 3.0 32.9) and use of a specific device (Intrafix versus no fixation, RR = 10.6, non-significant) resulted as the main risk factors.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com