Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
into details
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "into details" is not correct in standard written English; the correct expression is "in detail." You can use it when you want to indicate that something will be explained thoroughly or comprehensively.
Example: "During the meeting, we will go in detail about the project timeline and deliverables."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He wouldn't go into details.
News & Media
You cannot go into details.
News & Media
He did not go into details.
News & Media
She declined to go into details.
News & Media
We don't really go into details.
News & Media
But he declined to go into details.
News & Media
"Then we started to look into details.
News & Media
I can't go into details".
News & Media
But he never went into details.
News & Media
I don't want to go into details".
News & Media
Still, Sweetie would not go into details.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, always use "in detail" instead of the non-standard "into details". This ensures your writing aligns with formal English conventions.
Common error
A common mistake is using "into" instead of "in" before "detail". Remember that "in detail" is the idiomatic and grammatically correct expression to indicate a thorough explanation.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "into details" functions as a prepositional phrase, though it's considered non-standard. While commonly used, it doesn't adhere to standard English grammar, as noted by Ludwig.
Frequent in
News & Media
74%
Science
17%
Formal & Business
3%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
While the phrase "into details" is quite common, appearing frequently in news and media sources, it's essential to recognize that it's not grammatically correct. Ludwig AI highlights that the standard and preferred phrase is "in detail". When writing formally or aiming for grammatical precision, always opt for "in detail" or other alternatives like "thoroughly" or "comprehensively". Using correct phrasing enhances clarity and credibility in your writing. In short, while "into details" might be understood, it's best to avoid it in favor of its grammatically sound counterpart.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
in detail
Replaces "into" with the correct preposition "in" to form the grammatically correct phrase.
thoroughly
Indicates a comprehensive and exhaustive approach, focusing on the completeness of the examination.
exhaustively
Emphasizes the comprehensiveness and completeness of the detailing.
comprehensively
Highlights the broad scope and complete coverage of the information provided.
meticulously
Stresses the precision and attention to detail in the examination or explanation.
precisely
Highlights accuracy and exactness in presenting information.
specifically
Directs attention to particular aspects or elements, offering a focused explanation.
particularly
Similar to 'specifically', emphasizes certain aspects over others.
at length
Indicates a detailed and extended explanation, focusing on the duration and depth.
elaborately
Suggests a high degree of ornamentation and complexity in the detailing.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "into details"?
The correct and standard way to express thoroughness in explanation is to use the phrase "in detail".
Is "into details" grammatically correct?
No, "into details" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct expression is "in detail".
What can I say instead of "into details"?
You can use alternatives like "in detail", "thoroughly", or "comprehensively" depending on the context.
What is the difference between "into details" and "in detail"?
"Into details" is non-standard and considered incorrect. "In detail" is the grammatically accepted and widely used phrase to mean thoroughly or comprehensively.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested