Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(20)
Candidates for secondary stakeholder interviews were identified by their extensive work with ICSs and guidance from D-Lab's Biomass Fuels and Cookstoves group.
First, face-to-face concept elicitation (CE) interviews were identified as the 'traditional' approach [1].
Specific passages of the interviews were identified that support the broader concepts.
Participants in these interviews were identified through relevant community agencies and provided written, informed consent.
Some codes distinct from the PSD interviews were identified.
Codes from the interviews were identified and grouped under categories generated from the interview topics.
Similar(40)
Themes that emerged during the interviews are identified under the sub-headings below.
Content from the participant interviews was identified by the first and second authors independently, then together with agreement on each item that was coded into N-vivo 8.0.
Finally, similarities and differences in the patients' situations, beliefs and experiences of care between the two points of interviews are identified.
Direct quotes of comments from the key informant interviews are identified by ' KI-hospital ID- KI ID, hospital category/location)' KI-hospitalelected to reflect the major emergent themes.
Because region of residence and year of SHAS interview were identified as likely confounding factors of nonadherence to PCP prophylaxis a priori, these variables were included in all multivariable models.
More suggestions(15)
conversations were identified
questionnaires were identified
interviewees were identified
visits were identified
interviews were implemented
surveys were identified
respondents were identified
questions were identified
candidates were identified
interview were identified
maintenance were identified
interviews were found
interviewed were identified
interviews was found
interviews were formulated
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com