Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(4)
Participants' performance during practice interviews was evaluated using an interview checklist created specifically for this study.
During the survey analysis, only the technical content of the interviews was evaluated; the assessment of the nonverbal communication was omitted.
Information in subsequent interviews was evaluated against these eight categories.
The pool of items generated by the focus group interviews was evaluated by nine professionals (i.e. doctors, nurses, and researchers).
Similar(56)
The "one interviewer – one patient" interviews were evaluated to provide added value from the words and statements that the interviewed subjects chose.
In this study, the interviews were evaluated and scored by a group of independent doctors unaware of each others' evaluations.
The interviews were evaluated using Mayring's (2011) method of content analyses.
Emerson says they found that women who perform on par with men in computer coding interviews are evaluated more poorly in whiteboarding interviews.
Data collected through observation and interviews were evaluated using percentages, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests.
Finally, the interviews are evaluated according to the perception of certification of different actors, and possible direct and indirect social effects will be stated.
All interviews were tape recorded, and 5 percent of the recorded interviews were evaluated for interviewing quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com