interviewed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "interviewed to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to indicate a purpose or reason for the interview, but it requires additional context or words to be grammatically correct. Example: "She was interviewed to assess her qualifications for the position."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

2008 A worse-for-wear Kerry Katona is interviewed to plug her latest MTV documentary.

Independent

Guillermo Barros Schelotto has reportedly interviewed to be the manager of the Columbus Crew.

The Guardian - Sport

Then, like Ms. Smith, she takes on the personas of those interviewed to tell their stories.

The New York Times

Recruits are interviewed to fill in for Jules Amy Jo Johnsonn), recovering after being shot.

The New York Times

Local taxi firms have been interviewed, to see if anyone drove her away.

The Guardian

He interviewed to be the head coach, before the Jets selected Herman Edwards.

The New York Times - Sports

Jagodzinski was fired by Boston College after he interviewed to be the Jets' coach.

The New York Times

Subjects were interviewed to elicit information on putative risk factors.

Oral Oncology

Participants were then interviewed to discuss their photos.

Land Use Policy

Students were also interviewed to provide additional information.

Language Testing in Asia

To strengthen our understandings, teachers were interviewed to check the comprehensiveness and validity of our interpretation.

Computers & Education

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating purpose, replace "interviewed to" with clearer and grammatically correct alternatives like "interviewed for", "interviewed in order to", or "interviewed with the aim of".

Common error

Avoid using "interviewed to" as a purpose connector; this phrase lacks grammatical correctness and may cause confusion. Instead, use more explicit constructions such as "interviewed for" or "interviewed in order to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interviewed to" functions as an attempted purpose clause, intending to explain the reason for conducting an interview. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically incorrect and needs restructuring for clarity. Examples show attempts to connect the interview with its intended outcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "interviewed to" is a grammatically incorrect construction frequently used to express the purpose of an interview. Despite its prevalence across various domains, including Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business contexts, Ludwig AI identifies it as incorrect, advising users to use alternatives like "interviewed for" or "interviewed in order to". The analysis indicates that while the intent is to convey the reason for the interview, the phrase fails to do so effectively. Therefore, writers should avoid this construction in favor of more grammatically sound options to ensure clarity and professionalism.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

interviewed for

Replaces "to" with "for" indicating the purpose of the interview more directly.

interviewed in order to

Adds "in order" to explicitly state the purpose of the interview.

interviewed with the aim of

Uses "with the aim of" to express the intention behind the interview.

interviewed so as to

Employs "so as to" to indicate the purpose of the interview.

conducted an interview to

Restructures the sentence to clarify that the interview was conducted for a specific purpose.

interviewed to determine

Specifies the goal of the interview by using "to determine".

interviewed with the intention of

Uses "with the intention of" to express the intent behind conducting the interview.

interviewed for the purpose of

Clarifies the reason for the interview by using "for the purpose of".

interviewed as part of

Indicates that the interview is one component of a broader process or investigation.

was interviewed to

Changes the active voice to passive, while still needing additional modification for correctness.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically correct alternative to "interviewed to"?

Alternatives include "interviewed for", "interviewed in order to", or "interviewed with the aim of depending on the context".

How can I use "interviewed for" correctly in a sentence?

Use "interviewed for" to indicate the specific reason or position someone was interviewed for. For example, "She was interviewed for the marketing manager position".

Is "interviewed to" ever considered acceptable in formal writing?

No, "interviewed to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Opt for clearer alternatives like "interviewed in order to" or "interviewed for".

What is the difference between "interviewed for" and "interviewed in order to"?

"Interviewed for" directly states the reason, while "interviewed in order to" explicitly expresses the purpose or intention behind the interview. The best choice depends on the context and desired level of clarity.