Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Dominant trends in the transcripts and field notes from each interview were compared with those of the remaining four interviews to identify patterns in caregivers' experiences.
The codes and subcategories in the individual interviews and the focus group interview were compared.
The pairs of narrative interview reports for the same interview were compared and discussed in relation to the research questions.
The categories and codes from each interview were compared with other interviews in order to identify common links.
Codes and categories from each interview were compared with codes and categories from other interviews for common links.
Amongst trial non-participants, the 77 who agreed to be approached for an interview were compared to those who did not (106).
Similar(53)
Pre-admission and on-admission functional status obtained from the interview was compared with results extracted from the medical notes.
Analysis was iterative and concurrent with data collection in that each interview was compared with subsequent interviews for converging as well as diverging patterns.
The transcript of each interview was compared with the written notes and listened to by everyone involved to check for accuracy and content.
Self-reported hysterectomy status on the questionnaire or at the interview was compared to ultrasound findings of the presence or absence of a uterus.
Global assessment at the time of interview was compared to subsequent clinical (assessed by chief residents) and cognitive performance (assessed by the American Board of Pediatrics in-service training examination).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com