In addition, interviewers should understand that the interview narratives should not be contaminated by their pre-understanding, i.e., the meaning attributed according to personal experiences, theoretical understanding, hypotheses or assumptions [ 49].
In the interview narratives, respondents link Chagas disease with experiences of marginalization and rural poverty, and describe multilayered impediments to accessing treatment.
We draw on our participants' interview narratives to ask how their culturally situated, sometimes disparate, understandings of intimacy shaped their relationships with their parents or in-laws.
Such visualizations are able to promote subjective validations of interview narratives as well as to highlight subjective perceptions, reasons, motivations, and network dynamics.
In this paper we use the word in its economic sense (Bevelander & Petersson, 2014), and also as a discursive device which echoes through some, but actually surprisingly not so many, of the interview narratives.
Interview narratives were recorded, transcribed and subsequently analysed using a thematic approach.
Data needs to be analyzed and interpreted in conjunction with the interview narratives.
Interview narratives and descriptive field notes were analyzed with MAXqda2 (VERBI Software, Marburg, Germany) using qualitative content analysis [ 46].
We have included the questionnaire in the supplemental material of this paper.> The research team conducted qualitative thematic analysis of the interview narratives [ 39– 41].
