Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A second student from the advanced majors presented "genetic drift" as one possible solution for the fourth interview item about cactus spines (see the "Methods" section).
Qualitative data from in-depth interviews were entered into a word processor (Microsoft Word) and imported into MAXqda in a format that allows automatic coding by interview item.
Similar(58)
Face validity of draft interview items was ensured through iterative feedback between project staff and the Steering Committee.
For the intra-coding, the researcher chose three pieces of text from the interview items which had been already coded to recode them.
We analyzed how parents responded to the interview items with respect to their comprehension, judgment and estimation, and ability to document a response.
Legend: The table shows the results from Spearman's correlations between STB interview items and questionnaire items on the SPAN sample in both waves (wave one and two combined N = 1456).
Indeed, only one student (Participant G from the advanced majors sample) accurately and consistently used both genetic drift and natural selection as possible mechanisms for evolutionary change across the four interview items (see below).
The interview items were translated from English into Finnish by health care professionals with knowledge of DSM diagnostics.
EMIC interview data from community respondents will be imported into MAXQDA using the prestructured coding feature to automatically code narratives according to the structure of the semistructured interview, item-by-item.
Suicidal behavior was determined using four questions from the screening-section of the K-SADS-PL diagnostic interview: item-1 suicidal thoughts ("1" = none, "2" = occasional, "3" = frequent), item-2 suicide attempts and their seriousness ("1" = none, "2" = ambivalent, "3" = serious) and item-3 suicide attempts and their lethality ("1" = none, "2" = not life-threatening, "3" = life-threatening).
Secondly, the qualitative investigators independently coded the open-ended interview items using a multi-coder team.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com