Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
To initially explore the statistical associations of attractiveness and license, the ratios of mean attractiveness after/before interventions were computed, considering all projects of a given change in licensing schema (summarized in Table 5).
Similar(59)
DALYs saved for each HIV infection averted by each intervention were computed with and without age-weighting as YLLs + YLDs (Pre AIDS) + YLDs (AIDS).
Significance values (p) for percentage differences (baseline and post-intervention) were computed using on-line Java Script tests on difference paired proportion estimates from a set of random paired observations for the intervention parameters, i.e. HI, CI and BI (http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/Business-stat/otherapplets/PairedProp.htm).
The total health benefits of an intervention were computed by comparing the number of healthy life years lived in the population in a particular intervention scenario with the total number of healthy life years lived in the population under the null scenario.
Differences between treatment groups for each marker in the intervention trial were computed using analysis of covariance.
Cluster-level summaries of some women's characteristics in the control and intervention periods were computed and presented as means and standard deviations.
Differences in intervention groups were computed both in unadjusted (via unpaired t-tests) and adjusted (via regression analysis) analyses for all continuous outcomes of interest (i.e. FLACC change score, crying time, and maximum heart rate difference).
Marginal effects were computed for intervention arm within each baseline class.
Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were computed for an intervention with respect to the next most effective alternative after eliminating strategies that were dominated (that is, those that were more costly and less effective than other options) or those that were weakly dominated (that is, had higher cost effectiveness ratios than more effective options).
Data were computed for control and intervention groups.
The kappa and percentage disagreement were computed separately for each intervention and then averaged.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com