Exact(1)
The first contrast in the multiple regression analysis tested if the two simultaneous cognitive physical interventions performed better compared to PHYS.
Similar(59)
The group that received the combined intervention performed better in textual articulation, measure used to assess the overall quality of text production, with highly significant group × time interaction and large effect size between groups at T2 and T3.
Table 3 shows there was no statistical difference in the proportion of cases with significant colorectal pathology for either intervention, with neither intervention performing better than the control, and indeed the point estimates suggesting the interventions performing worse.
H 0 : µ 1 – µ 2 = 0 The alternative hypothesis is that any intervention performs better than the other: H A : µ 1 – µ 2 ≠ 0 A confirmatory intention to treat analysis (2-sided test), including all patients as randomized, will be performed on the mean differences in the VAS pain values between the two treatment groups.
The intervention group performed better than the control group on the two items that assessed understanding of geologic magnitude.
Intervention HCs performed better than control HCs in most services (seven of nine), although only one of these improvements (Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination) reached or approached statistical significance.
13– 17 However, it is often not recognized that even if the intervention group performed better than the control group, it does not prove conclusively that all subjects will benefit from the intervention; some may in fact be harmed.
The GPs in the intervention group performed better than the GPs in the control group on " Perceived preparedness" and " Perceived knowledge" in both the post-intervention (p = .012, r = .50 and p = .001, r = .68) and the 12-month follow-up (p = .024, r = .45 and p = .007, r = .54) as well as better than the residents in " Perceived preparedness" at post-intervention level (p = .037, r = .41).41
An extensive 2004 review of implementation interventions found 5 15% improved application of evidence-based practices, but multifaceted interventions performed no better than single-focus interventions [ 4].
This either implies that the intervention was a success or that the intervention GPs who received CME already performed better than the rest of the intervention group.
Individual interventions may perform better in particular settings and the process of combining studies may lose an element of specificity in attempting to produce a generalisable example.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com