Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
Through this systematic review we have explored the literature on digitally delivered behavioral interventions for headache.
Finally, we acknowledge that there are no established data on the effect sizes of the electronic behavioral interventions for headache.
As a literature review, we only report on published clinical studies and ignore industry and private efforts to use technology to deliver behavioral interventions for headache.
Of the 23 papers on digitally delivered behavioral interventions for headache, all were published after the year 2000 and most (55%%) were published after the year 2010.
What are needed now are CEAs on interventions for headache disorders more broadly, rather than migraine alone, which in real life is not treated in isolation.
Although the pilot nature of many of these studies makes it difficult to directly compare outcomes, results of these 23 studies can help guide future efforts to develop more effective, engaging, and evidence-based digital interventions for headache.
Similar(52)
However, biofeedback training is also well addressed as a functional intervention for headache.
Inclusion criteria for the CTH group were: satisfying ICHD-II criteria for CTH, aged 18 65 years, not currently receiving (or having received in the last 12 months) intervention for headache, no psychiatric or major medical condition currently or in the last 12 months, no concurrent headache or pain symptoms or diagnoses (other than CTH).
We also examine the overall feasibility of smartphone interventions for primary headache disorders.
To review the published literature of behavioral interventions for primary headache disorders delivered by electronic means suitable for use outside of the clinician's office.
The purpose of this systematic review is to describe the current body of literature on electronic behavioral interventions for primary headaches that can be used outside of the clinician's office.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com