Exact(4)
The level of penetration of the intervention was weak to modest.
We noticed that the intervention was weak already during its implementation.
Because the intervention was weak, an impact on outcomes was unlikely.
The reviewing function of the intervention was weak and sometimes failed to solve problems in the development of liaison or recall.
Similar(4)
The evidence for the interventions was weak overall.
The effect of the intervention is weaker as expected in the ITT analysis than the CCA, indicating the difference between a pragmatic result (effectiveness) and compliant result (efficacy) of approximately 8 percentage points in test scores.
The evidence base to support the use of such pet-based interventions is weak.
Overall, evidence for the efficacy of psychosocial interventions is weak [ 25].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com