Exact(11)
HHB increased from 9.3% at baseline to 25.4% post intervention (odds ratio: 3.3; confidence interval: 1.7 6.5; P < 0.001).
The effects of all five studies are close to the true intervention odds ratio of 1.13.
aOR, estimated intervention odds ratio; b P-value, significance level for SNP interaction with clinical trial intervention.
Table 3 shows estimated intervention odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals as a function of the number of minor alleles of rs7705343 for each of the four interventions.
The latter once again employed case-only analyses, and for descriptive purposes, intervention odds ratios were estimated separately at zero, one, and two minor SNP alleles.
A neutral effect was reported in three studies (n=1148) for appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator intervention (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.46) and in six studies (n=31 111) for sudden cardiac death (0.81, 0.52 to 1.25).
Similar(49)
Reaching secondary school or college was similarly significantly associated with increased odds of using the interventions (odds ratio 1.43 and 1.41, respectively), as was having had a previous pregnancy (odds ratio 1.16) (Table 2).
This additive effect was confirmed by the random effects logistic regression model (Table 3), which shows there is no suggestion of a significant interaction between the two interventions (odds ratio 1.02, P=0.979).
HIV positivity was significantly higher in districts with a high proportion of FSWs registered with targeted interventions (odds ratio [OR] 2.02; 95% CI 1.18-3.45), and in districts with medium (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.58-4.08) or high (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.05-2.29) profortion of urban population.
The summary of the overall magnitude of the effect of the dataset was beneficial, favoring the intervention group (odds ratio [OR]=.56).
The estimated intervention effect (odds ratio) will be reported with 95% confidence interval and p-value testing the null hypothesis of no intervention effect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com