'intervening process' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to a process (such as a procedure or action) that takes place between two events, stages, or outcomes. For example: "The intervening process of sorting the data proved to be the most challenging part of the project."
Whether you find the scene sly and winning or, in terms of boudoir etiquette, plain rude, it's clearly fired by the belief that, because the end product of standard romance heterosexual marriage, followed by children is in such patent flux, the chemistry of the intervening process must be no less radically changed.
Whether you find the scene sly and winning or, in terms of boudoir etiquette, plain rude, it's clearly fired by the belief that, because the end product of standard romance — heterosexual marriage, followed by children — is in such patent flux, the chemistry of the intervening process must be no less radically changed.
Digital files can go from the publisher to the end user in one step with no intervening process.
Thus, we argue that in addition to any mutational biases, some intervening process of selection is helping to fix nonsynonymous conversion events.
In fact, single-stage DEA considers a DMU as a 'black box' and neglects intervening processes, i.e., different series or parallel functions.
Furthermore binding is directly dependent on its interaction with a highly accessible target without intervening processes (e.g. cell membrane transporter function, vessel permeability, tissue diffusion) that have the potential to confound quantitative reporting of the molecular target.
Thus, it might be that cortical variations in ΔCBF/ΔCMRO2 could change over cortical regions, reflecting intervening processes of age, disease, learning, and other influences.
By specifying the intervening processes more precisely and by testing them more systematically than before, we hope to have gone some way towards unpacking the age-old puzzle of the psychological bases for positive collective emotion.
Furthermore, rates of adherence with these interventions, which are characteristically low [ 7], may be improved by incorporating program content and functions that increase therapeutic efficiency by targeting intervening processes directly [ 8].
Other authors raise its limited attribution power: case studies are good at analysing the intervening processes or documenting evolution in time, but weak at demonstrating the causal links between intervention and outcome [ 29].
Beyond having the skills to follow up on the intervening processes (what we have called pathways) assumed to link intervention and impact, evaluation teams should have the flexibility to pursue evidence of other impact pathways that emerges, e.g. when substantial improvements are observed in control groups.
