Sentence examples for interval of respondents from inspiring English sources

The number (% and 95% confidence interval) of respondents who chose each of the statements was determined.

The percentage (95% confidence interval) of respondents who preferred to be informed of harmful ME, of near miss ME, or by at-fault physician were 60.0% (56.8 to 63.2), 35.5% (32.4 to 38.6), and 59.7% (56.5 to 63.0), respectively.

OR = odds ratio for increase in behaviour rate between 1990 and 2003, CI = confidence interval Analyses of respondents from areas of lower versus higher deprivation showed very similar results to those of social class in terms of patterns of changes in risk behaviour over time (Table 6).

Compared with classical test theory approaches, the advantages of IRT include the following: near-equal interval measurement; representation of respondents and items on the same scale; and independence of person estimates from the particular set of items used for estimation [ 46].

The sample is separated into class intervals, or subgroups of respondents at similar relative locations, which serve as the within-groups factor.

Univariate analyses were conducted as follows: Categorical variables (cohort, specialty chosen, sex, ethnicity, when first considered specialty, when decided to apply for specialty): chi-squared tests were used to compare proportions in each group, and the bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals of proportions of respondents in each group were compared.

Categorical variables (cohort, specialty chosen, sex, ethnicity, when first considered specialty, when decided to apply for specialty): chi-squared tests were used to compare proportions in each group, and the bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals of proportions of respondents in each group were compared.

Ninety percent95%5% confidence interval [CI] 84.6 95.4%) of respondents determined that, after review of the living will, the patient's code status was DNR, and 92% (95% CI 86.5 96.6%) defined their understanding of DNR as comfort care/end-of-life care.

Second, the bootstrap procedure (500 replications) was used to estimate the confidence intervals of the proportion of respondents endorsing each item and of the mean level of psychological distress (Table 1).

* OR = Odds Ratio ** CI = Confidence Interval For the motivation status of respondents, the following variables were subjected to multiple logistic regression: 'socioeconomic status', 'knowledge score of organ donation' and 'perceived allowance of organ donation in religion'.

Overall 3.8%95%5% confidence interval (CI) 3.2 to 4.5) of respondents and 8.8%95%5% CI 7.5 to 10.3) of those aged ≥ 50 years reported that they had been diagnosed with osteoporosis by a doctor.