Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(2)
Values are mean ± standard deviation or geometric mean (95% confidence interval) for continuous variables or percent for dichotomous parameters.
12 We calculated standardised mean difference and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, and P<0.05 was taken as significant.
Similar(58)
In [1], Gao and Meng established a generalized Gronwall-Bellman type integral inequality, named Mate-Nevai type nonlinear integral inequality for continuous functions, which is one case of inequalities containing integration on infinite intervals for continuous functions.
Descriptive statistics were presented as either means with 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables (e.g. Jadad score) or as percentages with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous and categorical data.
Descriptive statistics are reported as means and ranges or 95% confidence intervals for continuous data and proportions for binary data.
Descriptive statistics included means and 95% confidence intervals for continuous measures and counts and percentages for categorical measures.
We calculated mean values with standard deviations and median values with minimum-maximum intervals for continuous variables.
20 For all included trials we report relative risks (95% confidence intervals) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (95% confidence intervals) for continuous outcomes.
We report results of network meta-analysis as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals for categorical outcomes and weighted mean differences with 95% credible intervals for continuous outcomes.
29 Intervention effects were expressed with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous data and mean differences and 95% confidence intervals for continuous data.
When possible, we collected or calculated the relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference between the groups with confidence intervals for continuous outcomes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com