interrupt with

USAGE SUMMARY

"interrupt with" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used to describe someone who speaks over and interrupts another person's conversation. For example: "The boss was in the middle of explaining the project to the team when her assistant began to interrupt with his own ideas."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

39 human-written examples

No place is too public, seemingly no activity too private to interrupt with a cellphone conversation.

The New York Times

The narrator burbles so that her ancient informants can interrupt with tart, terse, reductive quips.

The New York Times - Books

If he got the right feeling, his partner would interrupt with breathless talk about finding a wallet on the street.

The New York Times

Her comment prompted Mr. Obama to interrupt with an exasperated, "Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no".

The New York Times

"The Tafoya daughters were told that it was rude to interrupt with questions, so they missed much of the conversation," the Blairs said in their book.

The New York Times - Arts

Throughout the meeting, Ailes would interrupt with something he had read or heard, in a style that was part oracle and part standup comic.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

I interrupted with angry questions.

The New Yorker

I interrupted with offended, aggrieved crying.

The New York Times

But Mr. Wells kept interrupting with questions.

The New York Times - Magazine

A friend interrupted with a skeptical frown.

The New York Times

Arthur interrupted with a call for broccoli.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "interrupt with" when you want to describe a sudden break in a conversation or activity by someone contributing something new.

Common error

Avoid using "interrupt" alone when you intend to specify what the interruption consists of. Always follow "interrupt" with "with" and the content of the interruption to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "interrupt with" functions as a verb phrase that describes the action of breaking into a conversation or activity by introducing something new. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase. The examples provided demonstrate how it's used to depict the act of interjecting.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Wiki

20%

Science

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "interrupt with" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe the act of breaking into a conversation or activity by contributing something. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, and examples show its use across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While it is suitable for many situations, choosing a more formal alternative like "interject with" may be preferable in certain professional settings. Remember to use "interrupt with" when you want to specify what is being introduced during the interruption.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

interject with

A more formal synonym for "interrupt with".

break in with

Focuses on entering a conversation abruptly.

cut in with

Implies a forceful or unwelcome interruption.

chime in with

Suggests a more casual and often welcome interjection.

disrupt with

Emphasizes the disturbance caused by the interruption.

butt in with

Suggests an impolite interruption.

intrude with

Highlights the unwelcome nature of the interruption.

interfere with

Broadens the meaning to include hindering a process, not just speech.

chatter during

Focuses on simultaneous talking, differing from a direct interruption.

comment during

Implies a remark made while something else is happening.

FAQs

How can I use "interrupt with" in a sentence?

Use "interrupt with" to describe someone breaking into a conversation or activity. For example, "She didn't mean to "break in with" her opinion, but she felt it was important."

What's a more formal way to say "interrupt with"?

A more formal alternative to "interrupt with" is "interject with". It suggests a more deliberate and considered intervention.

Is it rude to "interrupt with" questions?

Whether it's rude depends on the context and the way you do it. Generally, it's better to wait for a pause before "chime in with" questions, unless clarification is urgently needed.

How does "interrupt with" differ from simply "interrupting"?

"Interrupting" indicates the act of breaking in, while "interrupt with" specifies what is being introduced during the interruption, such as an argument or a question. In short, "interrupt" refers to the action and "interrupt with" refers to the content of the action.