Sentence examples for interrogation could be from inspiring English sources

Any evidence derived from his interrogation could be seen as fruit from the poisonous tree.

By Chief Justice Rehnquist In Miranda v. Arizona, we held that certain warnings must be given before a suspect's statement made during custodial interrogation could be admitted in evidence.

In the wake of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, in which the Court held that certain warnings must be given before a suspect’s statement made during custodial interrogation could be admitted in evidence, id., at 479, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 3501 which in essence makes the admissibility of such statements turn solely on whether they were made voluntarily.

His question was perhaps a feeble one, but, for anyone observing, the fact that he'd stood up from the bench and begun some sort of stalling interrogation could be seen as crucial, either in a deeper intervention to be conducted by more effective or informed members of the community or in some later accounting of Stevick's comportment and behavior.

He said interrogations could be done legally.

Even if statements from former detainees are ruled inadmissible in court, the testimony of witnesses learned about during interrogations could be powerful prosecution evidence if allowed by a judge.

Without adequate oversight and discipline, an environment was created in which shifting guidelines for control over an estimated 45,000 detainees, and evolving rules for interrogations, could be interpreted freely and even disregarded.

Some intelligence experts believe that recording interrogations could be valuable, since the tapes could be replayed for expert linguists, studied by psychologists or reassessed in light of new information.

Our results show that using the updated algorithm the number of patients with non-diagnostic interrogations could be reduced from 38 to 16%.

During proceedings brought before the high court in London, lawyers representing the former Jfit prisoners suggested the interrogation centre could be regarded as "Britain's Abu Ghraib".

Insisting that the terrorists could never be made available for direct testimony, the Justice Department tried to fashion a compromise last year in which written summaries of interrogation statements could be presented to a jury.