One father interprets this reaction as representative of many fathers having greater difficulty bonding with their babies, as they do not experience the same connection as the mother during pregnancy (father 5 C/S, D/C).
By contrast, Mangun and Hillyard [ 17], in a central cue Posner paradigm, showed that adults presented an increased P3b to invalidly cued targets compared to validly cued targets, and they interpreted this increase as a reaction to failed expectancies.
In addition, several studies have described diffusely distributed and perivascular lymphocytes in tissue membranes around failed MOM implants apparently not associated with infection, and the authors have interpreted this inflammation as an immunologic reaction against metal ions or metal particles associated with those articulations [ 4, 5, 7, 10, 12, 15– 17].
Two observers interpreted the reactions in a blinded fashion.
The software then interprets this information into a reaction sequence, writes the appropriate equations, optimizes the model parameters while keeping them in physically and chemically allowed bounds, and does statistical analysis of the results.
The zwitterion mechanism was used to interpret the reaction kinetics.
We interpret the reaction to marital status, wealth, and pension as evidence of relatively higher financial constraints and dependence faced by female individuals.
Effects of various experimental parameters on the conversion of triglycerides and selectivity to glycerol carbonate were studied to interpret the reaction kinetics.
Our choice here was based upon our ability to interpret the reaction chemistry in vivo.
Thus, when they experienced the suspected ADR, they felt obliged to take responsibility to interpret the reaction on their own.
