The phrase "interpretative framework" is a proper and commonly used term in written English.
It refers to a set of beliefs, assumptions, or principles that are used to analyze, interpret, and understand a particular topic or subject. One example of using this phrase in a sentence could be: "The researcher's analysis was guided by the interpretative framework of feminist theory, allowing for a deeper understanding of the societal factors influencing gender roles."
But his chief interpretative framework, deliberately, was someone else's — namely, Karl Marx's.
If we hadn't gone to Dr. G.'s, we would have assumed that she was simply overtired, but now we had a different interpretative framework, one founded on fear.
As for Dzeng, she has come to understand the path she needs to take to get published, where the manuscripts she submits to medical journals will need to be written through a more "objectivist mindset", rather than through the "interpretative framework" that she feels is more appropriate for her project.
This interpretative framework has rules and limits.
An interpretative framework is proposed in order to identify the main contextual factors impacting company choices.
Methodologies are value and belief sets that provide an interpretative framework for understanding the impact and significance of those activities.
The combination of diverse research methods helped to identify and disclose interpretative frameworks and related handling strategies of natural disasters and climate change.
However, to realize this potential, the development of new technologies and interpretative frameworks grounded in ecological design principles are needed to overcome computational and analytical bottlenecks.
Several distinguishable features are noted—holism with respect to particular ascriptions, indeterminacy with respect to systematic interpretative frameworks, and the responsiveness of mental ascription to an ideal of rationality.
With our current interpretative frameworks, we usually see these phenomena meet with opposition, both because of the diversity they brings and because they falls prey to the nationalist agenda.
An extended follow-up study must include questions about the different interpretative frameworks the communicators use.
