Sentence examples for interpretations would have from inspiring English sources

Or one might be willing to acknowledge in a very general way that equality for women is a good thing, without being committed to interpreting particular everyday situations as unjust (especially if is unclear how far these interpretations would have to extend).

Any of those interpretations would have been plastered on top, like the poorly adhering bandage on that gash.

We do this by considering the very different implications for climate science that these interpretations would have.

Radiologist double-reading with referral of all abnormal mammograms, instead of referral following consensus in case of discrepant interpretations, would have resulted in 1473 referrals (referral rate, 1.39%, 95% CI=1.32 1.46), 530 screen detected cancers (CDR, 5.00, 95% CI=4.57 5.42), and a sensitivity of 68.8%95%5% CI=65.6 72.1).

In that moment, any interpretation would have seemed reasonable.

The government said that the panel's interpretation "would have a profound impact on the ability of the United States to prosecute not only this case but other international terrorism cases and even traditional espionage cases".

In a dissent joined by three other justices, Roberts defended the narrow reading of "Legislature," pointing out that the broad interpretation would have made the Seventeenth Amendment (1913), which established that senators should be elected by the people rather than (as originally provided in the Constitution) appointed by state legislatures, entirely superfluous.

Level 3 aggregates of the corresponding variables were not included since their interpretation would have been difficult from a theoretical point of view na not applicable ** p < 0.01.

So, this interpretation would have Kant avoiding the detachment objection, but at the cost of no longer presenting an account of instrumental incoherence that holds regardless of whether the end is reasonable or good.

(This makes more precise the somewhat cryptic remark from the introduction that it is not obvious what an interpretation endorsing the realist principle VD, but rejecting the realist principle NC, should look like. Such an interpretation would have to violate a third realist principle, i.e. FM).

If the real nature of things is indeterminable by us, as the epistemological interpretation would have it, then to attempt to determine the nature of things, and to provide cogent grounds for the superiority of one's own theories, is to attempt the impossible; such matters are simply beyond our grasp.