Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
The well log interpretations were considered for lithofacies classification and permeability modeling.
Similar(59)
For these reasons only the clinician's predictions and interpretations were considered.
His interpretations were considered elegant and refined.
The well log interpretations that were considered for lithofacies classification and permeability modeling are neutron porosity, shale volume, and water saturation as a function of depth; however, the measured discrete lithofacies types are sand, shaly sand, and shale.
The most abundant gene ontology terms, representing at least 5% of the genes in the lists, with P-values lower than 0.05, were considered for interpretation.
Several measures of agreement were considered for interpretation of results in this study.
Genes with log2-ER > 0.4 in at least one time point and common functional annotation according to the STARS program [ 21] were considered for interpretation in the Results section.
The following ranges were considered for interpretation of the kappa coefficients [ 36]: poor agreement, <0.00; slight agreement, 0.00-0.20; fagreementment, 0.21-0.40; moderagreementment, 0.41-0.60; substagreementreement, 0.61-0.80; almost perfect agreement, 0.81-1.00.
The following ranges were considered for interpretation of the kappa coefficient: poor agreement = less than 0.00, slight agreement = 0.00 0.20, fair agreement = 0.21 040, moderate agreement = 0.41 0.60, substantial agreement = 0.61 0.80, and almost perfect agreement = 0.80 1.00.
Current CLSI breakpoints [ 8] were considered for susceptibility interpretation.
All 32 experts (i.e., sorts) were considered for the interpretation of the roles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com