The point that I am making and will continue to develop further in this essay is that if theatre is a (maybe, special) case where private rule-making occurs because interpretation happen via private thought processes, then it follows that there is a resulting difficulty in forming public agreement surrounding the referents in a play.
If the interpretation happens to make a sentence of the language state something true, then the interpretation is a model of the sentence (see the entry on model theory).
Unfortunately, the complexity of whole-genome analysis, the cost of data generation, and the need for analysis and interpretation to happen in a clinically relevant timeframe have limited the scaling of this most comprehensive approach to high throughput.
If we go on to add this information, so that S comes to express a true or false statement, we are said to interpret S, and the added information is called an interpretation of S. If the interpretation I happens to make S state something true, we say that I is a model of S, or that I satisfies S, in symbols 'I ⊨ S'.
Although this is a valid interpretation, it may happen that authors commit changes in the same clone, and this would lead to a wrong answer for this question.
"The Laffer Curve," said Mr. Volcker, "was presented as an intellectual support for the idea that reducing taxes would produce more revenues, and that was, I think, considered by most people a pretty extreme interpretation of what would happen".
I used inverse-kinematics to get the motion so it's not just my interpretation of what will happen.
Individuals give their own meaning and interpretation to the things that happen in their environment, and this meaning and interpretation is also shaped by interaction with other people.
Interpretations of what happened next differ.
