Overall, an average mortality rate of 10.5/100,000 was calculated, but interpretation should be with caution due to the heterogeneity of studies.
However, interpretation was approached with caution given the great phylogenetic distance between these species, and differences in sequencing platforms, both of which makes it difficult to discern adaptations to their differing thermal environments.
Although we used the random effects model of meta-analysis to derive an overall incidence rate, the large degree of heterogeneity identified implies that interpretation should be with caution.
This distinction from the general trend suggested a limited cross-talk between Msh6 and other pathways: this could be because its protein product acts exclusively in MMR, although such an interpretation is made with caution.
With just the four data points (1993, 1998, 2003 and 2008 09) available for the present analyses, we treat our findings and interpretations with due caution.
However, this interpretation should be reviewed with caution, as the biosorption and isotherm exhibit an irregular pattern.
This interpretation should be treated with caution, however, as we cannot rule out the possibility of the chance clustering of the low virulent genotypes within a single cluster.
Hence, this technique, when used in biological cells, lacks proper control and the data interpretation should be treated with caution [11], [23], [24].
Of course this interpretation should be considered with caution as we measured bacteria multiplication in vitro, and not in the insect host.
This interpretation must be treated with caution as our inference was powered to detect differences on the order of calendar years, because the date of viral isolation was measured in years and not in months or days.
