Sentence examples for interpretation were assessed using from inspiring English sources

The consistency (reliability) and confirmability (validity) of data analysis and interpretation were assessed using five widely used techniques [ 13, 15].

For assessment of student skills in graphical data visualization and interpretation, 27 group lab reports were assessed using the rubric that focused on the appropriateness, clarity, and quality of the figures, figure legends, and data interpretations (Table 4; see the Supplemental Material for the rubric used).

Images were assessed using Quips CGH Analysis and Interpretation software (Vysis, Richmond, UK).

Differences in the interpretation of invasion depth between group III and groups I and II were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Protein concentrations were assessed using the Pierce ™ BCA Protein Assay Kit

Time trends were assessed using birth cohorts.

Potential interactions were assessed using logistic regression.

Differences between groups were assessed using ANOVA.

In part B, interpretation of grammar was assessed using the test of reception of grammar (TROG), and results were compared to PNFA.

Patients' interpretation of verbal risk information was assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale.

The association between interpretations of threat, negative emotion, and control was assessed using hypothetical ambiguous scenarios in a sample of 271 anxious and nonanxious mothers of 7- to 12-year-old children with an anxiety disorder.