Sentence examples for interpretation of the harm from inspiring English sources

There are interesting questions about the correct interpretation of the harm principle, which we will examine later.

This route is more robust, since it recognizes in blacks a complex moral interpretation of the harm they are suffering, which presupposes the condition the earlier rendering could only stipulate.

On this broader, interest- or rights-based interpretation of the harm principle, any speech or conduct that wilfully or negligently interferes with important interests or rights of others is harmful conduct.

For while some liberals understand the notion of "harm" to others very narrowly, as including only physical interference with a person's bodily integrity (e.g., murder, battery, torture, kidnap, rape and other such physical assaults etc)., most liberals nowadays are inclined to accept a slightly broader interpretation of the harm principle.

On this interest-based interpretation of the harm principle, the state is entitled to pass laws against conduct that deliberately or negligently interferes with the rights of others, just so long as the rights-violation is sufficiently serious and the harm cannot effectively be prevented by other, less costly means (for example, through public education or debate).

Ultimately, interpretation of the potential for harm that can be caused by a chemical of concern (COC) is duration and intensity of exposure that determines the severity and rate of damage.

7. It is beyond the scope of the entry to work out an interpretation of harm that specifies the necessary and sufficient conditions for wrongful harming.

"The government's unexpected interpretation of the law will disproportionately harm people with complex chronic conditions and disabilities," said Myrl Weinberg, the chief executive of the National Health Council, which speaks for more than 50 groups representing patients.

A sufficientarian interpretation of the threshold notion of harm (together with an appropriate conception of wrongdoing) provides us with a plausible understanding of what is owed to future people: the fact that future persons' existence is contingent on our present decisions does not matter where what is in question is our ability to harm future people's interests and to violate their rights.

These factors include personal values about cost-effectiveness, rescue, and interpretation of the dictum 'first, do no harm'.

Observers questioned their own interpretation of the incident or the potential harm because the actor was much more experienced and higher in hierarchy.