This prerequisite provides the relevant basis for the interpretation of the neurobiological correlates.
Is this variability in classification (i.e. interpretation of the image) correlated with the neural response to the AS during the sessions?
Based on the aforementioned discussion, MOS cannot be directly applied for biometric quality, as there is no conclusive evidence that human interpretation of quality correlates with the quality in terms of the performance of a recognition algorithm.
Secondly and relatedly, exemplar cases can help interpretation of the behavioural factors and their neural correlates in terms of real individual patients [given that PCA, by design, generates scores that are at least one step removed from raw clinical measures: see Lambon Ralph et al. (2003)].
This is obtained through the interpretation of joint scores and loadings, prediction of the globally joint variation and correlated biological interpretation of the datasets.
During the interpretation of ambiguous images, neural responses of individual cells in IT to ambiguous photographs (AS) were significantly correlated with the interpretation of the AS image (Fig. 3A).
The interpretation of the ambiguous sample was, in turn, highly correlated with the normalized response of individual neurons in IT to the ambiguous sample.
In the SICU, viewpoint 1 was correlated least with the other viewpoints, but interpretation of the factor provided no new perspective on the study topic.
If so, the interpretation of the AS at the beginning of the session might be even better correlated with the neuronal response to the AS than is the interpretation over the course of the entire session.
Caution must be exercised in a simultaneous interpretation of the effects of changes in temperature and precipitation, as these changes are negatively correlated in our sample.
