1975) or adaptive (Lande 1980; Lande and Arnold 1983), the differences between neutral and functional heterozygosity levels at the beginning of model runs preclude any conclusive interpretation of slight differences in changes when fishing occurs, especially when changes occur at a scale of only a few percentage or less.
A peak in salt-tolerant Tamarix charcoal and the pronounced decrease of Pistacia and Amygdalus that may have formed open woodland communities as observed in AH VI are consistent with the interpretation of slight drought stress, but could alternatively indicate a reduction in biomass productivity in relation to lower CO2 concentrations.
That is, despite having the same level of dissatisfaction at T1 and T2, an individual may give a rating of 'moderately agree' at T1, but a rating of 'slightly agree' at T2 because her/his interpretation of what constitutes slight and moderate agreement change over time.
Doubtless it would be possible to over-interpret the man, but since there has been so little interpretation of him to date, the danger is slight.
The fact that the results produced by PCA and variable ranking approach as considered by random forests are similar is an evidence, as also argued by some authors [51], that the effects of correlation between descriptors mostly affects the interpretation of the model, with only slight effect on its predictive power.
Mr Jouty said: "At this stage, clearly, we are not in a position to have the slightest explanation or interpretation of the reasons that could have led this plane to descend... or the reasons why it did not respond to attempts to contact it by air traffic controllers".
We used the following interpretation of the Kappa values: < 0.2 = slight, 0.2 0.4 = fair, 0.4 0.6 = moderate, 0.6 0.8 = substantial and > 0.8 = almost perfect [ 37].
There were some slight differences in the interpretation of the coefficients between the two models.
We used Landis and Koch's suggested criteria for the interpretation of the agreement: 0 to 0.2 represented slight agreement, 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement, 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement, and 0.61 to 0.80 substantial agreement.
The singers stopped periodically, and the parties discussed phrasing, interpretation and slight changes to the score.
Furthermore, given that paired (pre-post) designs are powerful enough to detect statistical significance even for slight changes in scoring, the interpretation of these findings should take into account not only statistical significance but also the magnitude of the differences and these are, in the vast majority of the cases, slight.
