Sentence examples for interpretation of agreement from inspiring English sources
To compare the interpretation of agreement in the prediction of neonatal outcome variables, using the limits of agreement (LA) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
It should be noted that the interpretation of agreement results on continuous variables using ICC should be performed with caution.
The following interpretation of agreement was used for the kappa values: low (0 0.5), moderate (0.51-0.75) and excellent (0.76-1.0) following established guidelines [ 23].
The only major disadvantage is that it is limited to ordinal scale variables, since if the categories where on a nominal scale, permuting the order may affect the visual interpretation of agreement.
The criteria considered in the interpretation of agreement: -1.0 to 0.0 poor; 0.0 to 0.20 discrete; 0.20 to 0.40 regular; 0.40 to 0.60 moderate; 0.60 to 0.80 substantial; 0.80 to 1.00 nearly perfect [ 16].
The criteria described by Landis & Koch [ 12] were considered in the interpretation of agreement: -1.0 to 0.0 poor; 0.0 to 0.20 discrete; 0.20 to 0.40 regular; 0.40 to 0.60 moderate; 0.60 to 0.80 substantial; 0.80 to 1.00 nearly perfect.
In the end, the judges ruled that despite all the new recording technology in recent decades, "long-settled common law contract rules still govern the interpretation of agreements between artists and their record producers".
We used Landis and Koch's suggested criteria for the interpretation of the agreement: 0 to 0.2 represented slight agreement, 0.21 to 0.40 fair agreement, 0.41 to 0.60 moderate agreement, and 0.61 to 0.80 substantial agreement.
The interpretation of the agreement was based on the agreement scale by Landis and Koch, 11 which indicates fair agreement at κ levels between 0.21 and 0.40, moderate agreement between 0.41 and 0.60, substantial agreement between 0.61 and 0.80 and almost perfect agreement between 0.81 and above.
But American objections to the sale are based not on narrow interpretations of agreements but on the broader principle that Israel as an ally should defer to Washington's strategic judgments in regions beyond the Middle East.
