Content-based interpretation examined treatment effect on specific item responses.
Sanford Levinson, in his rebuttal to Amar, argues that rather than engaging in a textual interpretation, those examining the meaning of constitutional provisions should interpret them in the fashion that provides the most benefit, and that legislatures being able to restrict gubernatorial appointment authority provides a substantial benefit to the states.
Two additional researchers (GP and SS) helped in data interpretation by examining trends and patterns.
Strength testing in adduction was excluded due to consensus on issues concerning practicality and interpretation when examining this patient group.
Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were used as a second method of data collection in the case study setting, since these "can get close to the social actors' meanings and interpretation, by examining their accounts of the social interactions in which they have been involved".
This interpretation was examined by finite difference method simulations of seismic wave propagation using possible velocity structure models.
The numerous benefits that it offers include, in particular, improvement in the interpretation of examined data, full or nearly full automation of tasks normally performed by a physician, better precision and accuracy of obtained results, and also possibility of exploring new imaging modalities, leading to new anatomical or functional insights.
To further test this interpretation, we examined double mutant strains.
To verify this interpretation, we examined same-strand (W–W' and C–C') distributions, which obviates the need to recover fragments spanning CDEII.
All hot spots on the bone scintigraphy with an equivocal interpretation were examined by computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
