Sentence examples for interpretation does not require from inspiring English sources

Furthermore, the data interpretation does not require complex computational models and calculations.

There is a second interpretation of Hempel's argument that, unlike the first interpretation, does not require that we think of the full content of (2.4.2) as somehow already implicit in (2.4.1) Instead, (2.4.2) plays the role of an ideal against which (2.4.1) should be measured.

As noted by Pepe [ 9], the conditional probability function is not a predicted probability and its interpretation does not require any implicit assumptions.

The use of de novo peptide sequencing for mass spectral interpretation does not require a reference database, thus offering a promising solution to this problem; however, current methods are not yet capable of handling the complexity of peptide sequence diversity present in serum.

Interpretation WOSI score does not require an examination of the patient and can be administered by mail.

This position asserts that, under principles of treaty interpretation, IHR 2005 does not require States Parties to share biological samples with WHO.

But there is a simple interpretation of these passages that does not require us to read Locke as offering a different account of freedom as the ability to suspend.

The bias of the researcher was minimised by measuring the outcomes with a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that does not require interpretation.

As Shamdasani observes, "in a critical sense, 'Liber Novus' does not require supplemental interpretation, for it contains its own interpretation," and so it is at last possible to begin a study of Jung with the work he held above all the rest.

Specificity is comparable with a single-lead ECG analysed by a cardiologist and the result does not require specialist interpretation, which is an advantage over the single-lead ECG monitors and keeps screening straightforward and costs less.

The appeals court, which heard the case last May, ruled that Judge Batts's interpretation was incorrect and that "the law does not require that a secondary use comment on the original artist or work, or popular culture," but only that a reasonable observer find the work to be transformative.