Until now, these various genetic markers are analysed separately by conventional karyotyping, 24-colour karyotyping, FISH and/or LOH studies (Ambros et al, 2003), making these analyses time consuming and rendering their interpretation difficult as not all markers could be studied at one time.
The importance of human-driven interpretation, as raised by Ross, is one not to be under-estimated, and it's worth exploring how, even when relying on data analytics, human involvement is still required.
We favour the former interpretation as do not believe that many participants knew which group they were in; they had no prior knowledge about this research and were given no information about the different tasks – those in the control group did not know that the active participants were seeing foods in their task, and vice-versa.
However, Infinium HumanMethylation450 analysis and interpretation appear not as easy as initially thought and this, given the various reasons that we have reviewed and discussed here.
Appropriate and consistent classification of the FHR patterns is still the weakest link in intrapartum monitoring, as education and training in FHR interpretation is not as widespread as the method itself.
These analyses are presented here because they show that the results from TFAM are biologically meaningful, though their interpretation is not as straightforward as one might have believed.
Color and texture features could provide additional information; however, their robustness to different data sets is questionable, and their interpretation is not as obvious as that of morphological features, which are used in clinical practice.
In this regard, since PET/MR is a new modality, its interpretation is not as straightforward as for CT or PET/CT and requires a combination of anatomical, metabolic and functional information.
That interpretation is not as much an anomaly as it might seem — though it doesn't necessarily lead to violent acts.
I would read Breard as consistent with this interpretation, i.e., as not saying that the Convention never trumps any procedural default rule.
