Sentence examples for interpret this notion from inspiring English sources

The claim that s's justification from e for p requires s to have background information i is customarily understood as equivalent (in this context) to the claim that s's justification from e for p depends on some type of independent justification for believing or accepting i.[6] It is possible to interpret this notion of dependence in counterfactual terms (see for instance Moretti & Piazza 2013).

One can interpret this as a notion for no-arbitrage under drift and volatility uncertainty (as in, e.g., Biagini et al. 2017).

We interpret this result with the notion that children's behavior observed from outside is not necessarily to be connected with the children's own perception.

This study, however, wishes to primarily interpret the notion in its epistemological sense: as a more dominant group representing the world in a certain way, urging the audience to accept this truth as an inevitable reality, in addition to a more sociological view that sees ideologies as permeating various layers of social life.

While it avoids thorny political issues like unification, the agreement states there is only one undivided China, but it also allows Taipei and Beijing to interpret the notion of "one China" as they see fit.

Although it remains to be seen how broadly courts in EU Member State interpret the notion of posting a link for financial gain.

Many recent discussions of the cosmological argument, both supporting and critiquing it, interpret the notion of a necessary being as a being that cannot not exist.

But however we interpret the notion of realization, a social language is a language (or some part or aspect of a language) individuated by reference to a plurality whereas an idiolect is a language (or some part, etc).

To economically interpret the notion of closeness given by Definition 4, recall that x 1, x 2, and x 3 stand for the employment shares of agriculture, manufacturing, and services, respectively [cf. Sect. 2.1 and (6)].

Scholars have found it difficult to interpret the notion of material falsity, partly because Descartes' discussion of it in the Third Meditation seems to offer two possibilities, and partly because his long discussion of the issue in the Fourth Replies, in response to Arnauld's Objections, is intricate and seemingly contradictory.

How do you interpret this?