Sentence examples for interpret the trial from inspiring English sources

Given the recent policies mandating public disclosure of results for relevant registered trials [9], [10], information on trial methods will be increasingly important to reliably interpret the trial results.

This paper describes the views and experiences of 102 UMPIRE trial participants and 41 health professionals in India and the UK to help interpret the trial findings and to understand why adherence favoured the polypill and specific subgroups.

The numerous appendices (section 16 of ICH E3) contain important online supplementary data needed to understand and interpret the trial, its context and history. 1 2 These appendices include such documents as the trial protocol, protocol amendments, statistical analysis plan, blank case report forms, certificates of analysis, randomisation lists and consent forms.

29 Finally, consideration was given to the statistical approaches of interpreting the trial.

The most common rationales were optimising implementation into clinical practice (6), interpreting the trial findings (5), optimising the trial process (4), improving recruitment and consent procedures for the trial (2), and generating theories and models to guide intervention development (2).

Data from the non-imputed analyses, adjusted for the three covariates of employment status, living arrangements and accommodation were therefore reported for the purposes of interpreting the trial results.

Among the seven comparisons (six trials) 15192037424542 45 with discrepant levels of nominal significance in unadjusted versus adjusted analyses, the authors interpreted the trial focusing primarily on the statistically significant result in four trials (five comparisons) 19 37 42 45 where the experimental treatment tended to be better.

During those exchanges, Mr. Davis often revisited and interpreted the trials at which he was convicted — of weapons possession and the murder of a drug dealer.

However, a better definition of the prognostic profile of the patients could help in interpreting the trials and could be useful to clinicians to identify treatment more appropriate for high-risk patients.

Aside from concerns about type I and II error when interpreting the trials in this review, there are other relevant outcomes addressed by some, but not all of these studies, including effects on nutritional markers and adverse outcomes such as catheter sepsis and patient comfort.

This characterization may increase the likelihood that clinicians will interpret the ALVEOLI trial demonstrating higher PEEP as ineffective; in fact, as I have noted, the results remain consistent with an important effect.