Sentence examples for interpret him as from inspiring English sources

Most commentators interpret him as having very grave misgivings about distant action, if not outright rejecting the possibility.

So, it is natural to interpret him as thinking that among primary substances are concrete particulars that are members of natural kinds.

One can interpret Berkeley as implying that there is more to the self than introspection can capture, or we can interpret him as saying that notions, though presenting stranger entities than ideas, capture them just as totally.

When for example Nishida writes "absolute nothingness transcends all that is, but at the same time all that is arises through it" (NKZ IX, 6), we may interpret him as pointing to an undifferentiated source beyond the distinctions it gives rise to, a source that is necessarily entailed by their being brought together precisely as distinct from one another.

In many ways, Smithers represents the stereotype of a closeted gay man, and numerous overt allusions and double entendres concerning his homosexuality are made, though some of the show's producers instead interpret him as a "Burns-sexual".

Positivist scholars, who pushed Alberti as a proto-enlightenment figure, were ambushed by left-wing, chiefly Italian critics, who have pulled Alberti in another direction, interpreting him as an anticlerical misfit at the papal court, a subversive whose writings undermined the grand urbanistic projects they were called to celebrate.

Nor is this reading of Ryle a standard one: even many of his students interpreted him as a behaviourist and irrealist.

It would seem, prima facie, that Berkeley ought to be committed to empirical idealism, and yet Kant interprets him as rejecting transcendental realism.

For phrenology, John van Wyhe, The History of Phrenology on the Web. 2. See, in particular, Hofstadter, 1955: 40-1, for an egregious misinterpretation of Spencer that runs together interpreting him as a social Darwinist and a proponent of traditional natural rights.

Without taking a stand on which of these interpretations best captures Skolem's own intentions, we note that most of Skolem's contemporaries interpreted him as giving something like the "traditional" argument described above and that their responses to Skolem's Paradox reflected this interpretation.

The New Yorker interpreted him as "an American consumer of advanced technology and vast amounts of food".