Sentence examples for interpret a decision from inspiring English sources

At the least, it would mean stripping out a procedural layer that at present enables one member's courts to interpret a decision made by any other's before it is acted on.

Equally, they worry that Israelis will interpret an American decision to withhold their veto as meddling in their election in March.

Most legal experts, however, interpret a 1983 Supreme Court decision on Congress's authority to overrule the president to mean that parts of the statute are unconstitutional.

Justice Ginsburg observed that when there were two ways to interpret a state court decision, one that raised potential constitutional problems and another that did not, the justices had traditionally endorsed the nontroublesome interpretation.

Stefan Ingves, the chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, was responding to some economists and other critics who interpreted a recent decision by the committee as a signal that regulators were losing their resolve to contain risk-taking by banks.

For Mr. Bush, whose administration had been accused by some environmental groups of interpreting a Supreme Court decision in a way that would restrict protection of wetlands, the announcement appeared to be an effort to blunt an issue important in Florida and other key battleground states, in the Midwest and New England.

This algorithm can be interpreted as a decision feedback equalizer (DFE), driven by the aforementioned criteria.

Deaths certified as being caused by "pneumonia" can also be interpreted as a decision by the physician not to search for a better diagnosis, or if a better diagnosis is available not to treat the patient for this disease, but to let him or her die from what has always been considered the "old man's friend" [ 23].

Multiplying by a constant does not change the choice for c *: (9) J ″ c = TP c × (1 − P ) + TN c × P. It can be easily seen that Equation 5 is equal to Equation 9 when r = (1 - P .2 Consequently, Youden's J can be interpreted as a decision theoretic approach which uses a cost ratio equal to the proportion of healthy persons in the population (also see, e.g., [ 9], p. 572, or [ 10], p. 8).

Each case the court selects, by the agreement of at least four justices, under its internal rules, is a vehicle intended to accomplish something: to clarify the law, interpret an ambiguous statute, resolve conflicting decisions among the lower courts or, as in the Shelby County and Fisher cases, to change the status quo.

Such observations suggest that the results obtained here might be best interpreted in a decision-making context.