international comparisons

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "international comparisons" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing or analyzing data, trends, or situations across different countries or regions. Example: "The report provides international comparisons of education systems, highlighting the differences in student performance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

International comparisons, though, are problematic.

The Guardian - Opinion

However, such international comparisons flatter to deceive.

The Economist

He also makes interesting international comparisons.

The New York Times - Books

However, international comparisons tell the opposite story.

The New York Times

The report includes some revealing international comparisons.

The Guardian

It is worth making a final point regarding international comparisons.

The Guardian

But others say the international comparisons are apt.

The New York Times

Now international comparisons make it clear who is failing.

The Economist

The international comparisons were possible because of earlier Gallup studies of Muslims overseas.

The New York Times

The concept of poverty becomes even more slippery when attempting international comparisons.

The Economist

And the book would be much better for some international comparisons.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "international comparisons", specify the criteria or metrics being compared to provide context and avoid ambiguity. This enhances clarity and relevance for the reader.

Common error

Avoid drawing broad conclusions from "international comparisons" without considering the specific cultural, economic, and political contexts of each country. Generalizations can lead to inaccurate or misleading interpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "international comparisons" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct, and its function is to identify a type of analysis or assessment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "international comparisons" is a grammatically sound and commonly used noun phrase that serves to describe the act of comparing data across different countries. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness and broad applicability. It's important to provide context when using this phrase to avoid overgeneralizations and ensure the validity of the comparisons. Alternative phrases such as "global benchmarks" and "cross-national analysis" can offer more specific nuances. Understanding these elements ensures effective and accurate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

global benchmarks

Focuses on establishing standards across nations for evaluation.

cross-national analysis

Highlights the analytical aspect of comparing different countries.

worldwide assessments

Emphasizes the evaluation of various countries on a global scale.

comparative international studies

Highlights the scientific and research-oriented comparison of different countries.

transnational evaluations

Similar to global assessments, but stresses the crossing of national boundaries.

global metrics

Focuses on measurable indicators used for comparison on a world scale.

international benchmarking

Highlights the process of comparing standards and performance across nations.

comparative cross-country analysis

Focuses on the analytical element in a specific area.

global reviews

Describes the comprehensive evaluation of multiple countries or regions worldwide.

cross-border analyses

Highlights the examination of data and trends across different nations.

FAQs

How are "international comparisons" used in academic research?

In academic research, "international comparisons" are used to identify patterns, differences, and best practices across countries in various fields such as education, healthcare, and economics. They provide insights into the effectiveness of different policies and systems.

What are some common challenges in making accurate "international comparisons"?

Common challenges include data availability and reliability, differences in cultural and economic contexts, and the use of standardized metrics that may not fully capture the nuances of each country. Methodological rigor is essential to mitigate these issues.

What is the difference between "international comparisons" and "cross-national analysis"?

"International comparisons" generally refer to the act of comparing data or trends across different countries. "Cross-national analysis" specifically involves a more in-depth, systematic investigation of these comparisons, often using statistical methods to draw conclusions.

How can I ensure my "international comparisons" are valid and reliable?

To ensure validity and reliability, use reputable data sources, clearly define the metrics being compared, acknowledge limitations, and consider the broader context. Transparently document your methods and assumptions to allow for critical evaluation.