Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(43)
Internal responsiveness was assessed using Standardized Response Mean (SRM) statistics and changes in JOQOL domain scores.
However, the activities of daily living, recreation/social activities and posture/physique domains were found to be less- or non-responsive in regard to internal responsiveness.
Group level "internal" responsiveness is analyzed using the "standardized response mean" (SRM) statistic ("efficiency" [ 37]), defined as the absolute value of mean change (follow-up minus baseline scores) divided by the SD of this change [ 21, 38].
Therefore, in the present analysis we used (i) Standardized Response Mean (SRM) values to assess internal responsiveness [ 21] of the individual JOQOL domains and (ii) changes in JOQOL domain scores over 24 weeks (last observation carried forward; LOCF).
The internal responsiveness of FSS was comparable to the ORWELL97 (Standardized Response Mean = 0.50 and 0.44, respectively).
To assess the magnitude of the internal responsiveness, we have calculated the effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) [ 34].
Similar(17)
The new questionnaire's reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness, and validity were determined.
The analysis showed that internal consistency, responsiveness and correlations with other clinical indices were very similar in patients 12 17 years and patients 18 years and older.
Responsiveness was categorised into internal and external responsiveness.
The new SASDAS is a highly effective measure in assessing disease activity and it showed comparable internal and external responsiveness with respect to the ASDAS ESR/CRP response criteria in patients with axial SpA.
However, further empirical data will be needed to confirm the relationship between internal consistency and responsiveness, e.g., by reviewing studies in which health status instruments were compared on their responsiveness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com