intermediate score of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "intermediate score of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing a score that is between two extremes or levels, often in assessments or evaluations. Example: "The student achieved an intermediate score of 75, indicating a solid understanding of the material."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

It is characterized by full penetrance and intermediate expressivity, e.g. virtually all females in dpov1 containing stocks have oblique wings with an intermediate score of 3 on Dale Grace's scale [17], [27].

Plosone

Additionally, a look-ahead principle is used: The scoring of any given sub-sequence is stopped if the intermediate score of any of its prefixes plus the highest possible score for the rest of the sub-sequence is below the threshold.

Plosone

Individuals with an Achilles T-score above −1.0 are considered at low risk for having osteoporosis, while those with an intermediate score of −1.0 to −2.5 may have some risk of low bone mass, and those with a T-score of < −2.5 are considered at high risk of having osteoporosis and a high fracture risk.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Importantly, in a wide variety of tests and parameters, the intermediate scores of (bred) NAB, (purchased) CD1, and HAB/LAB F1 controls were found to be similar if not identical ([16]; unpublished results).

Plosone

The intermediate scores of 2 and 4 (F), and 2, 4 and 6 (S) were reserved for when all the tissue on a single plant exhibited the disease phenotype described for the preceding score.

BMC Plant Biology

HIGHEXT is of particular interest: these rats also obtained shorter chains of lever presses in the FCN task, whereas LOWEXT show intermediate scores of impulsivity in this task (ANOVA group × chain length: F 19,304) = 2.39, p <.001).

Behavioral and Brain Functions

For statistical survival analysis, the α-SMA-stained CAFs were classified into CAF poor-to-intermediate (scores of 0, 0.5, 1, and 2) versus CAF-rich (a score of 3) groups.

Cancer Medicine

Probes with an intermediate score were assigned a score of 0, since it was not possible to infer unambiguously the presence or absence of transposons.

BMC Genomics

In case of intermediate score (2+) samples were tested for gene amplification using a Her2 fluorescence in situ hybridization kit (Zytolight, SPEC HER2/CEN17 Dual Color Probe, Zyto Vision Ltd., Bremerhaven, Germany).

BioMed Research International

In an analysis of the reliability of the 4T score, a low score had a negative predictive value of 0.998, while an intermediate score had a positive predictive value of 0.14 and a high score a positive predictive value of 0.64; intermediate and high scores therefore warrant further investigation.

Wikipedia

The pre-frail older people had an intermediate score that was between the scores of the other two populations.

BMC Geriatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "intermediate score of", ensure that the context clearly defines the range or scale to which the score refers. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity about what constitutes 'intermediate'.

Common error

Avoid using "intermediate score of" without specifying the scale or range, as this can lead to confusion. Always provide context to clarify what defines the minimum and maximum values.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "intermediate score of" functions as a descriptor indicating a value that falls between two defined extremes. It serves to classify or categorize data within a specific range, as supported by Ludwig's examples related to medical risk scores and other scientific measurements. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "intermediate score of" is grammatically sound and primarily utilized in scientific and medical contexts, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves to classify data points that lie between two extremes, providing a more nuanced understanding of assessments. While not extremely common, its usage is straightforward, and its meaning is generally clear. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context defines the boundaries of the scale being referenced. Ludwig provides several examples demonstrating its proper application across various scientific domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

average score of

Replaces "intermediate" with "average", focusing on a central tendency rather than a middle position.

moderate score of

Replaces "intermediate" with "moderate", indicating a score that is neither high nor low.

mid-level score of

Substitutes "intermediate" with "mid-level", which gives emphasis on the level or rank of the score.

middle range score of

Specifies that the score falls within a central range, rather than just being a single, intermediate value.

median score of

Emphasizes the statistical measure of the middle value, which could be interchangeable with "intermediate" in some contexts.

central score of

Similar to "average score", but can also imply a score that is crucial or important.

score in the middle of

Restructures the phrase to emphasize the position of the score within a range.

typical score of

Indicates the score is common or usual, not necessarily in the exact middle.

representative score of

Suggests the score is typical or indicative of a larger group or set of data.

normalized score of

Specifies that the score has been adjusted to fit a standard scale, making it comparable to other scores.

FAQs

How is the term "intermediate score of" used in research?

In research, "intermediate score of" is typically used to categorize results that fall between clearly defined high and low values, allowing for nuanced analysis and grouping of data. For example, a study might classify participants with an "intermediate risk score of" 10-19 as being at moderate risk for a particular outcome.

What does an "intermediate score of" usually suggest?

An "intermediate score of" generally suggests a moderate level of performance, risk, or some other measured attribute. It implies that the subject is neither at the high end nor the low end of a spectrum. The precise meaning depends on the specific context in which the score is being used.

How do I choose between "intermediate score of" and "average score of"?

Use "intermediate score of" when you want to emphasize a position between extremes. Use "average score of" when you want to indicate the typical or mean value. The choice depends on whether you are focusing on a relative position or a statistical measure.

What are some alternatives to "intermediate score of"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "average score of", "mid-level score of", or "moderate score of". These alternatives may better convey the intended meaning based on the specific situation.