Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
interfere each other
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "interfere each other" is not correct in English.
A more appropriate expression would be "interfere with each other." You can use it when discussing how two or more entities affect one another negatively or disruptively. Example: "The two projects may interfere with each other if their timelines overlap."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(15)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
10 human-written examples
Assume that potential separation and blocking constraints have been omitted like described above and that k I = 2 ∀ I ∈ S, F = 1, 2, 3, 4, co ( I i ) = 0 ∀ i ∈ { 1, 2, 3 }, co ( { I i, I j } ) = 1 ∀ i, j ∈ { 1, 2, 3 }, co ( I 1, I 2, I 3 ) = 3. Obviously, every solution will induce an interference value strictly above zero, since at least two STRXs will interfere each other.
A possible drawback is that the two watermarks will interfere each other.
Another advantage of passive sensors is that multiple sensors operating in the same environment do not interfere each other.
However, care must be taken about the location of new wells as the drainage area of the wells should not interfere each other.
In non-optimal training signal, training signals simultaneously transmitted from different antennas collide and interfere each other, which degrades the LMMSE channel estimation performance.
For example, if the DINDs are mounted on general mobile robots, the possibility of collision with humans is increased and they will interfere each other.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
50 human-written examples
Thus, aforesaid OBU pairs can transmit on the same channel without interfering each-other transmissions.
Call this as interference set I1. Thus no two relays in I1 are interfering each other.
Hence, all the users can simultaneously transmit data to the BS on one or more subcarriers without interfering each other.
Qin and Tian [23] consider, as in [22], to group BSs interfering each other most strongly into a coordination set.
Finally, the mix of myostatin and dystrophin AONs showed that skipping two genes is feasible without interfering each other.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct preposition "with" when referring to mutual interference: "interfere with each other".
Common error
Avoid using "interfere each other". The correct and grammatical phrasing is "interfere with each other".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "interfere each other" functions as a reciprocal verb phrase, attempting to describe a mutual action between two or more entities. However, it lacks the necessary preposition and is therefore grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.
Frequent in
Science
70%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "interfere each other" is an attempt to describe a mutual action of disruption or negative impact. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "interfere with each other". Although this phrase is found in various sources, including scientific and news-related content, its usage is uncommon and should be avoided in favor of the grammatically sound alternative. When writing, remember to always include the preposition "with" to ensure accuracy and clarity. Using correct grammar ensures your message is well-received and understood, especially in professional or academic settings.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
interfere with each other
Corrects the grammatical error by adding the preposition 'with'.
affect one another
Uses 'affect' to indicate mutual influence, positive or negative.
collide with one another
Implies a direct conflict or clash.
counteract one another
Suggests actions that diminish or neutralize each other's effect.
impede one another
Focuses on hindering progress or action.
obstruct one another
Highlights the blocking or preventing of something.
hinder each other
Emphasizes the creation of difficulties or obstacles.
inhibit one another
Points to restraining or suppressing actions.
disrupt each other
Focuses on interrupting or disturbing the flow or process.
clash with one another
Suggests incompatibility or opposition.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "interfere each other"?
The grammatically correct way to express mutual interference is to say "interfere with each other". The preposition "with" is essential.
What does "interfere with each other" mean?
It means that two or more things are negatively affecting each other, causing disruption or preventing smooth operation. Other similar options include: "affect one another", "hinder each other" or "disrupt each other".
Is it ever correct to say "interfere each other"?
No, "interfere each other" is grammatically incorrect. You should always use the preposition "with": "interfere with each other".
What are some alternative phrases for "interfere with each other"?
Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "affect one another", "collide with one another", or "counteract one another" to convey the idea of mutual interference.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested