Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(52)
Two different interface models are considered.
In this paper, a review of interface models is presented.
Specifically, interface models for deflagration and detonation discontinuities are considered.
Diffuse interface models are well-known tools to describe dynamics of complex fluids ([1, 2]).
There has to be a commonality in the security models and the interface models between all those services.
Phase field (diffuse-interface) models of void growth were introduced (El-Azab et al., 2014; Hochrainer & El-Azab, 2015; Millet & Tonks, 2011a) with the goal to avoid the numerical difficulties encountered with sharp interface models.
Similar(8)
In this study, we compare dispersive modeling and sand-tank experiments to the results of sharp-interface models to evaluate assumptions regarding vertical fluxes in coastal multi-aquifer systems.
The field-theoretic models can be further classified into two categories, sharp- and diffuse-interface models.
It is obvious that sharp- and diffuse-interface models are able to relax all the assumptions of the rate theory.
Vertical freshwater leakage in sharp-interface models is treated in one of three ways.
The classical sharp-interface models of precipitation consider the interface between the precipitate and the parent phase to be a singular surface (Lifshitz & Slyozov, 1961; Rahaman, 2003).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com